Re: Informational RFC-to-be: draft-rfced-info-banan-00.txt

[Mohsen BANAN <mohsen@neda.com>]

>>>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 1998 11:47:09 -0800 (PST), RFC Editor <rfc-ed@ISI.EDU> said:
 
  RFC-Editor> ...
  RFC-Editor> Two week timeout is initiated (17 November 1998).
  RFC-Editor> ...

Aside from the comments from Keith Moore, I have
not received any other comments related to
draft-rfced-info-banan-00.txt.

While Keith Moore's comments may be relevant and
applicable to a standard's track document, they
do not apply to an Informational/Experimental
RFC. I have already responded to those comments
and am willing to supply you additional
information with respect to any of those
comments.


It is my understanding that
draft-rfced-info-banan-00.txt easily meets and
exceeds the requirements for publication as an
Informational/Experimental RFC because:

 - It is extremely relevant to today's Internet
   activity. 

 - Meets the technical standard for RFCs,
   because in addition to having gone through 
   extensive verification steps, it has already
   been used to produce independent
   interoperable implementations.

 - Meets the editorial standard for RFCs.


If the RFC Editor for any reason is considering
not to publish EMSD as an Informational RFC, I
request that you let me know immediately so that
I can either correct the problems or persuade
you of its fitness. 


As you know I am quite anxious to see
draft-rfced-info-banan-00.txt progress towards
its publication as an Informational RFC in a
timely manner.


Can you please let me know in what time frame
you expect to publish this Informational RFC?


Respectfully Yours,

--
        Mohsen Banan
        Neda Communications, Inc.               tel: +1-425-644-8026
        17005 S.E. 31st Place                   fax: +1-425-562-9591
        Bellevue, Wa 98008                      E-Mail: mohsen@neda.com
            U.S.A.                              URL: http://www.neda.com/